[tag]Paris, France, 16th[/tag] arrdt
How does this country hold together?
In the run-up to submitting all the study-abroad paperwork, that was the question that we asked about Italy. Italy, we joked, was a country that was basically run by no one – a country that, we later learned, couldn’t even prevent anyone from using its capital’s subway system for free. Now I’m wondering the same thing about France.
The difference between Italy and France, however, is that while Italy’s chaos seems to come from a complete lack of order, France’s [tag]chaos[/tag] comes from a surplus of it. There is so much order in France, so many functionaries and forms and offices and job titles, that nothing much gets done here either. Let me describe the course selection process a bit using, if I may, a cake metaphor. I’m too annoyed right now to be direct.
Suppose you wanted to bake a cake at McGill: you’d arrive at Shop Rite or IGA with a list of ingredients. You’d find each ingredient (class) in its appropriate aisle (department) and put it in your shopping cart (schedule). When you’ve finished loading ingredients, you check out. That means that add-drop period is finished and you’ve finalized your schedule. Simple enough.
But suppose that, for whatever reason, you happen to move to France. You want to bake a cake, with the same five ingredients. There supermarket is very easy to find and very clearly marked on the exterior; the only caveat is that you’ve been e-mailed directions in advance regarding how to enter. There is a door in front, but because of procedure, you’ll have to use the side door anyway.
You arrive at the supermarket to find that there isn’t even a door in front. Fair enough. But when you walk to the side and locate the door you should be entering, you find it locked, with no light behind it. You knock, to no avail.
But maybe, just maybe, if this supermarket is cracked out enough to require that you enter on the side, there might be doors in the back. And when you trudge to the back of the supermarket, you do indeed find doors. Fifteen of them, actually. And all of them are labelled with variations on the theme of food, but none actually mark an entrance to the supermarket.
You can narrow down which doors you need, somewhat. One is marked for people who want to cook with meat, and one for professional chefs, and one for people who are allergic to spiral-sliced ham. And somehow, through absolute sheer and dumb luck, you happen to knock on the right door, first try.
“Oh!” says the functionary apologetically. “You mean they didn’t update the e-mail? Yeah, they moved all our offices just around the corner. I don’t know why.”
Who’s they?
“Oh, I don’t know. The bureau of supermarkets.”
Which all obscures the fact that you aren’t even in the supermarket: you’re in an office next to the supermarket. And what the functionnary provides you isn’t actually the ability to purchase incredients: she gives you a list of ingredients sold at this supermarket. It’s twenty pages long. And you can’t just buy the ingredients you need, either. You have to buy a slate of ingredients – pick one from this column, two from this one, and you have to buy everything in this column. Never mind that you already have many of these ingredients. The response when you protest? Ce n’est pas possible.
When you’ve made your choices, made easier by the fact that in actuality half of the packet is completely irrelevant to you (they sell ballet slippers at this supermarket?), you go to the next office over, open Wednesdays from 8 to 10 and Fridays from 2 to 4. Another functionary will be approve your selections, assuming you bring three identity photos, two copies of your last gas bill, a bank slip, four copies of your most recent bowling scores, a signed and notarized letter from your shoe store relating to the size of your feet, and – oh! – proof of health insurance. When this man approves you, you’re in the clear. Now they’ll let you in the supermarket. And give you exactly what was approved, no more, no less.
This completely ridiculous drawn-out situational metaphor (”sitmet” – TV executives take note, I coined this phrase) is more or less what I’m going through right now, down to and including offices moving down the hall at random. I’m not going to identify what corresponds to what, but this gives you an idea. I miss McGill [tag]bureaucracy[/tag]. I really do. I’ve never been more in favour of a world takeover by McGill Ancillary Services than I am now. I wonder if they outsource?
Anyway, I did finally meet many of the other [tag]international students[/tag]. That happened at a really dorky-sounding event: a walk through one of Paris’s many gardens. Paris 1 hosts a large delegation of Germans and a fair number of Finlanders as well – and plus, since there are no students from American universities, I have become de facto Canadian here. Some of you will be really amused to hear that, especially since I’ve been presenting myself to everyone as American. But every question I receive is a variation on the theme of “In my country, we X. What do you do in Canada?”
Though I have officially gone on the defensive about being American now. That was with a Polish girl who I met at the international student office. I also tried to explain to her the glory of youforgotpoland.org, but it was in vain.
The only other thing to say, really, is that today I visited the Grande Arche de [tag]la Défense[/tag], and the surrounding malls, with the French cousin of a McGill friend. The Grande Arche is the modernist counterpart to the Arc de Triomphe, and much much larger than it looks in pictures. It’s surrounded by the area referred to as the Défense, which passes for Paris’s central business district even if it isn’t in Paris proper. More on that when I actually go over there with a camera.
So I think it’s time to get out of McDonalds. Tomorrow is bank account and cell phone day. Wish me luck. I’m hoping they’ll accept only three copies of my latest bowling scores. I mean, I have a good excuse: when I went to make the copies, I didn’t have proper proof of health insurance.